nutridense banner image
nutridense banner image

Forbes.com article celebrates American agriculture industry

February 4th, 2010 by Karlie Justus

Forbes.com, an online publication of Forbes magazine, ran an interesting column Jan. 19 on the agriculture industry and its recent struggles in the public policy arena. New Geographer columnist Joel Kotkin presents a detailed look at many of the positive aspects of American agriculture and logically refutes some of the attacks by urban aesthetes and green activists.

In the article, America’s Agricultural Angst, Kotkin establishes agriculture’s huge role in our country’s economic well-being:

Over the next 40 years the world will be adding some 3 billion people. These people will not only want to eat, they will want to improve their intake of proteins, grains, fresh vegetables and fruits. The U.S., with the most arable land and developed agricultural production, stands to gain from these growing markets. Last year the U.S.’ export surplus in agriculture grew to nearly $35 billion, compared with roughly $5 billion in 2005.

The overall impact of agriculture on the economy is much greater than generally assumed, notes my colleague Delore Zimmerman, of Praxis Strategy Group. Roughly 4.1 million people are directly employed in production agriculture as farmers, ranchers and laborers, but the industry directly or indirectly employs approximately one out of six American workers, including those working in food processing, marketing, shipping and supermarkets.

The author goes on to give an historical perspective on agriculture, and share why he believes agriculture’s past matters to its future.

Here at NutriDense, we believe Kotkin captures the essence of the messages we in production agriculture are striving to tell. What do you think about Kotkin’s argument?

Quality Control Ideas Relative to Total Mixed Ration (TMR) Considerations

February 3rd, 2010 by Jerry Weigel

The terms “quality,” “quality control” and “quality assurance” have all been defined in very narrow and certainly many different ways by the feed industry. The food industry has defined these terms to prevent defective and poor products and services as part of their manufacturing and delivering process. The feed industry also has this philosophy.

In my opinion whether you are talking about making a 16.00% Dairy Mix, producing ice cream or monitoring your total mixed ration (TMR), the words of Shewhart, as written in the Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product (1931) and published under the guidelines of the American Society for Quality Control, are important to remember:

Measured quality of manufactured product(s) is always subject to a certain amount of variation as a result of chance. Some stable “systems of chance causes” is inherent in any particular scheme of production and inspection. Variation within this stable pattern is inevitable. The reason(s) for variation outside this stable pattern must be discovered and corrected.

So, as we progress into a more targeted discussion about quality, let’s focus on the dairyman’s TMR. The nutritional advantages of using TMR-based feeding regimes have been written about since the late 1980’s. We know and understand about some of the advantages of TMR’s over separate feeding of forages and concentrates, and they include but certainly not limited to:

• More accurate proportions of forages and concentrates are delivered to the cows
• Ensuring a reduced risk of digestive upsets
• Assuring improved feed efficiency
• Improved response from certain industrial co-products (Hominy, DDGS, Gluten Feed)
• Better utilization of labor

I also realize that it is important to know the terminology around TMR, and those terms are:

Mixed Partial Ration (MPR) — MPR is often used in combination with TMR but top dressing of grain in the bunk or the use of computerized feeding systems also done. Often times free choice dry hay is used as well.
Mixed Total Ration (MTR) — A MTR is often used instead of the term TMR so they are the same.
Partially Mixed Ration (PMTR) — The PMTR is something that needs to be fixed, as the feed is not totally mixed and will be discussed in part within this discussion.
Totally Mixed Total Ration (TMTR) — The TMTR is the desired outcome of your mix.

In this discussion let us focus on the day-to-day aspect of TMR feeding.

It is my opinion that the success of any TMR and TMTR feeding regime absolutely requires the Herdsman, the person actually doing the feeding, and the Farm Manager or owner pay very close attention to the following areas

Changes in Dry Matter within the feed. Every dairy should have a moisture tester for their TMR. The TMR should be tested 2 times per week, minimum.

Add feeding ingredients in the proper order. Add the concentrates, like cereals and soya, first followed by the forages if you are using an auger mixer. Be sure and grind or chop dry forages and add them last, again with an auger system. If you are using a vertical mixer with center augers, add the dry chopped forages first followed by grains, concentrates and lastly the ensiled forages.

Do not over mix. Mixing time will vary with the type of mixer (auger or vertical), amount of feed in the mixer, size of the power (tractor or truck), and even the condition (old or new) of the mixer. It is recommended that the mixer should run 5 minutes from the time the last ingredient is added. In some vertical mixers the time may be shortened to 3 minutes. Over mixing creates a reduction in particle size and causes you to lose the physical effect of the fiber peNDF. This is why I recommend routinely checking particle size every 3 weeks, unless you see rumen/digestive upsets, with a particle size monitor, such as the Penn State Box. Follow their guidelines but remember that more than 10% on the top screen allows cows to sort feed ingredients.

Calibrate mixer scales. Check mixer weights at ⅓, ⅔ and full capacity. An easy and effective way to check this is to place a known amount of weight (such as 100 pounds) on each corner of the mixer at the 3 mentioned weight capacities and get your readings.

It is a must that you read in its entirety the manual for your mixer that you use for preparing your TMR.

To make sure your TMR mixer is functioning adequately and, more importantly consistently, sample several different locations within the bunk on a routine basis, say every month or so. Do this at the start of feed discharge, at 25%, 50%, 75% intervals across the feed bunk, and at the end of feed discharge. I have seen cases of digestive upsets in cows where they consume feed at the beginning of feed discharge, due to corn not being totally mixed and or not added at the correct time. Cattle are very dominate eaters and will often consume feed from the same place each day, each feeding.

Encouraging your customers to incorporating these suggestions into their Standard Operating Procedures will help them maximizing feed efficiency as well as the economics of milk production and cow well-being.

Jerry Weigel is the manager of nutrition and technical services for BASF Plant Science. He can be reached at gerald.weigel@basf.com.

Feeding Tips from the 2009 Penn State Dairy Cattle Nutrition Workshop

February 3rd, 2010 by Courtney Beck

Feed costs and milk prices were top of mind for all dairy producers in 2009, causing many to wonder what changes they could make to increase profitability. I recently had the opportunity to attend the 2009 Penn State Dairy Cattle Nutrition Workshop where Dr. Bill Weiss from The Ohio State University spoke on the topic of “Feeding Cows in Today’s Economy.” A few of the key messages on feed cost control that Dr. Weiss outlined in this presentation were:

• Economic Value of Feeds
• Ration Formulation Specifications
• On-farm Feeding Management Opportunities

Economic challenges have forced producers and nutritionists to re-think the nutritional strategies employed on today’s dairy operations. Dr. Weiss discusses rumen-undegradable protein (RUP) targets for specific lactation groups and what safety factors should be employed in RUP balancing. For example, he says “for a group of cows post peak dry matter intake, the RUP safety factor could be reduced to about 1.15 x pen average milk yield.”

Dr. Weiss and The Ohio State University provide several useful tools for evaluating and analyzing dairy management practices. The Feed Management toolbox provides a wealth of information as well as several calculators. One tool to take note of is the SESAME feed evaluation tool from Dr. Normand St-Pierre. This tool provides an analysis of feed values based on current price levels. The SESAME tool is a good way of using nutritional information to help dairy management determine the good valued feeds from those that are over valued.

If you’d like to learn more, click here to read Dr. Weiss’s paper.

Greg Jones is the NutriDense Silage Product Manager for BASF Plant Science. You can contact him at gregory.jones@basf.com.

Podcast: Greg Jones talks about his first months on the job

February 1st, 2010 by Courtney Beck

At the end of September last year, NutriDense welcomed Greg Jones to the team as Silage Product Manager. Greg joins BASF Plant Science with more than 13 years of experience in the dairy industry, including work at Diamond V Technologies, a manufacturer of yeast culture metabolites, Monsanto Dairy Business, Purina Mills Inc. and Koch Feed Products Company.

Greg has been busy pulling together marketing programs for the U.S. and Argentina, but we were able to talk with him for a few minutes about his first months on the job. Click on the link below to listen in.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Have a question for Greg? Reach out to him at gregory.jones@basf.com.