nutridense banner image
nutridense banner image

Visit the NutriDense Silage Team at World Dairy Expo

September 28th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

Darwin Kuhlers, Forage Specialist

World Dairy Expo

The NutriDense Silage team and dairy industry enthusiasts are preparing for the 2011 World Dairy Expo, which runs from Oct. 4 through Oct. 8 in Madison, Wis. Representatives from BASF Plant Science will be on hand throughout the week at the NutriDense Silage booth, Arena 450.

If you’re in the area, stop by our booth and register to win four 50-yardline tickets to the Green Bay Packers vs. Minnesota Vikings game, held at Lambeau Field on Nov. 14, 2011. Also on hand in our booth are vouchers for a free grilled cheese sandwich and milkshake lunch, redeemable at the always-popular University of Wisconsin at Madison’s Badger Dairy Club cheese stand.

I also invite you to attend a seminar conducted by Dr. Normand St-Pierre, animal sciences professor at The Ohio State University. He’ll be speaking on Friday, Oct. 7 at 11:00 a.m. on “Managing Your Margins: Practical Ways to Reduce Feed Costs and Increase Milk Price.” Attendees are eligible for continuing education credits: ARPAS (1) or RACE (1).

I look forward to seeing you in Madison!

Introducing the NutriDense Silage Calculator

September 21st, 2011 by Courtney Beck

What are the economic impacts of an improvement in feed efficiency (FE)? We recently debuted a new calculator tool on www.nutridense.com to help answer that question.

Through the NutriDense Silage Calculator, producers, nutritionists and consultants can plug in their own data to quickly evaluate the potential value that an improvement in FE may bring to a dairy operation.

NutriDense Silage Calculator

The calculator compares NutriDense Silage with dual purpose and brown midrib hybrids in various categories such as dry matter intake, FE, income over feed costs and more.

Check out the NutriDense Silage Calculator today, then contact your local NutriDense Silage seed company to learn more about NutriDense Silage.

Silage Cycle: Harvest

September 13th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

When preparing to harvest a new crop of corn silage, it is important to remember that silage crops are never the same from year to year.

In general, silage harvest begins when the milk line is one-half to two-thirds of the way down the kernel, or 42 to 47 days after silking. However, evaluating fields individually is important because maturity and moisture stages in corn silage can vary due to factors such as weather conditions, weed management, soil moisture and soil fertility.

Proper maturity and whole-plant moisture levels at harvest helps ensure the overall quality of the silage at feed out. According to J.W. Schroeder, North Dakota State University Extension dairy specialist, harvesting corn silage when whole-plant moistures are around the 60 to 75 percent range will bring higher milk yields per ton of silage fed, as well as allow for proper storage conditions and fermentation processes.

To read more about harvesting silage corn at the right moisture, check out this Hay & Forage Grower article.

For further reading:

Nutrient Management Practices: Water – Part Two

August 30th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

Last week we talked about the importance of water quality for dairy cows. This week we’ll learn more about effective water delivery that ensures cows are getting the amount of water they need.

Effective water delivery can often be overlooked, but it is one of the most important dairy herd management practices because it directly relates to the entire herd’s productivity. This includes the amount, size, temperature, location and cleanliness of water sources.

Donna Amaral-Phillips, dairy nutritionist at the University of Kentucky, says providing a steady flow of clean, fresh water in close proximity to milking stations is important, as cows are likely to drink up to 50 to 60 percent of their daily intake immediately after milking.

Here are some additional tips on setting up water stations:

  • Parlor area – Approximately two linear feet of watering space per cow is recommended.
  • Housing area – Approximately four inches of linear watering space per cow is recommended. A minimum of two water sources per group, located within 50 feet of the cows, is best.

To learn even more about water delivery, consult the following articles:

Nutrient Management Practices: Water – Part One

August 24th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

Water is the most important nutrient in a milking cow’s rations, making up more than 85 percent of a cow’s total nutrient consumption. On a daily basis, a lactating dairy cow drinks approximately 30 to 50 gallons of water each day, which is much greater than their protein, carbohydrate, fat and mineral intake.

The amount of water a dairy cow consumes can be influenced by dry matter intake, milk production, sodium intake and air temperature. The amount of milk a cow produces is directly related to the amount of water they consume, making it vital to provide dairy cows with plenty of clean water.

But it’s not just the quantity of water that’s key; the quality of water made available to cows is of equal concern. It’s important to have a laboratory analyze cattle’s drinking water, and nutritionists from Michigan State University suggest evaluating the total dissolved solids, sulfate, chloride, iron and nitrate-nitrogen. Excess amounts of these constituents could mean higher services per conception, lower first service conception rates, longer calving intervals and dehydration among other problems for herds.

Learn more about how to take action on water quality here.

Interested in learning more? Check back with us next week to learn about water delivery methods in Nutrient Management Practices: Water – Part Two!

Lameness Affects Dairy Herd Management

August 16th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

Dr. Nigel Cook, faculty member of the University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine, recently spoke at the American Dairy Science Association/American Society of Animal Science Joint Meeting in New Orleans, La. about lameness in the dairy industry.

Dr. Cook believes that lameness has big implications for dairy herd management and recommends a methodical approach to solving this increasing problem.

Locomotion scoring is the first step he recommends to reducing instances of lameness, and has risen in commonality over the last eight years. Next, Dr. Cook suggests revisiting the hoof trimming program to ensure the proper methods are being used.

Dr. Cook also advises keeping thorough records on any lameness issues, allowing veterinarians to easily note where problems keep recurring. Particularly, he says to track digital dermititis, white line disease and sole ulcer/lesions.

Other prominent factors proliferating lameness can include heat stress, milking schedules and type of flooring.

Feedstuffs covers more of Dr. Cook’s remarks in this article.

Controlling Dairy Costs

August 10th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

Mike Schultz, Purdue Extension dairy specialist, recently talked to Ohio’s Country Journal about keeping dairy feed costs in check during this lengthy period of high corn prices.

Schultz mentioned that the three highest cost factors for a dairy are labor, feed and replacement heifers – noting that two of the three factors are directly related to corn prices.

Some dairies are mitigating the damages of high corn prices by shifting their economic models – diversifying their operations by producing their own hay and grains for feed.

What are other options for dairy producers to cut costs?

Schultz suggests experimenting with the following options to further manage dairy costs, depending on the size of your herd and your dairy production:

  • Calculating feed requirements
  • Properly caring for forages
  • Breeding back cows quickly
  • Installing automated technologies
  • Signing forward contracts

To learn more, read the article in its entirety here.

Research Roundup

August 10th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

Here are some of the latest research findings pertaining to silage and dairy production presented at the 2011 American Dairy Science Association/American Society of Animal Science Joint Annual Meeting in New Orleans, La.:

2011 ADSA®-ASAS Joint Annual Meeting - New Orleans, Louisiana

165 The Effects of Protease Enzymes and Storage on the Ensiling and Nutritive Value of Corn Silage

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding protease enzymes to chopped whole plant corn on silage fermentation and nutritive value after varying lengths of storage. Chopped and processed whole plant corn (Mycogen TMR2W726, Dow AgroScience, Indianapolis, Ind.) was harvested (36.3 percent dry matter) and ensiled without enzymes or treated with one of two different proteases (E85 or E86; AB Vista, Wiltshire, U.K.) at one times (1X) or one hundred times (100X) the manufacturer’s recommended dosage. The enzymes were mixed with a phosphate buffer and applied to chopped forage while mixing. Replicated-treated piles of forage were prepared for each enzyme treatment. Four bags of forage were vacuumed and heat-sealed for each enzyme treatment and storage time and allowed to ensile at 23 ± 2 degrees C for 45 and 150 days. The hypothesis was that in the silo, proteases would liberate starch and increase starch digestibility (Starch-D). The statistical analysis included the main effects of enzyme treatments, days of storage and their interactions. When compared with untreated silage, there was no effect of protease or length of storage (45 vs. 150 days) on pH, concentrations of crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) or starch. At 45 and 150 days, treatment with proteases did not affect NDF-D or the concentrations of lactic acid, acetic acid or ethanol when compared with untreated silage. Ammonia-N and soluble-N (percent of CP) contents increased after ensiling compared with levels at harvest and were greater (P < 0.01) for the 100X enzyme doses when compared with untreated silage at both storage times (45 and 150 days). Starch-D (ruminal in vitro, seven hours) was 66.3 percent for freshly chopped corn plants. After 45 days of ensiling, treatment with E86 100X had greater (P < 0.01) starch-D (80.6 percent) than all other treatments except it was similar to E85 100X. After 150 days of ensiling, E85 1X (81.9 percent), E85 100X (82.9 percent) and E86 100X (88.6 percent) had greater (P < 0.01) starch-D than untreated silage (74.0 percent). Effects of the proteases on amino acid content and for longer periods of storage will be determined. The data obtained to date suggests that exogenous proteases could be used to improve in vitro ruminal starch-D in corn silages.

M352 On-Farm Dry Matter Testing to Improve Feed Delivery Precision on Dairy Farms

Silage comprises a major portion of total mixed rations (TMR) in most dairy operations. The content of the TMR that is offered to the animals differs from the intended ration. The uncertainty of rations may affect feed efficiency and consequently milk production, feed expenses and environmental losses. When silage is measured by weight, unaccounted for changes in silage dry matter (DM) content may substantially change a fed ration. The objective of this study was to measure variation in silage DM on selected dairy farms and determine the potential usefulness of an electronic method of on-farm DM analysis. A field survey of 31 Maryland dairy producers obtained data about on-farm DM analysis frequency, DM analysis methods, ration analysis frequency, feeding regimen, milk production and number of cows. Of those surveyed, 83 percent reported testing forage DM more than once per year by any method, and 63 percent reported testing DM by an on-farm method; mean number of cows was 103, and mean reported rolling herd average was 22,100 pounds. Eight surveyed producers volunteered to collect on-farm DM data for 21 days. Producers performed daily DM analysis using a Farmex 1210 electronic silage tester, recorded observations on rain events, and recorded ration changes related to the daily DM analysis. Silage samples corresponding to the on-farm DM analyses were retained, and were analyzed for DM after drying at 55 degree C followed by 100 degrees C (as standard method) and electronic tester (in-lab). There were large differences among farms in how well different methods of DM analysis compared. The difference between on-farm DM (electronic) and standard DM had a mean of 1.82 percent and SD of 4.99 percent. Ninety-five percent of observations fell within the limits of agreement (1.96 x SD ± mean) of −7.97 and 11.60 percent. The electronic method did not compare well to laboratory DM analysis for most farms.

T337 Effect of Replacement of Conventional Corn Silage With Brown Midrib Corn Silage on Behavior and Performance of Lactating Dairy Cows

Feeding forages with high neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility to high-producing cows has the potential to increase feed intake and milk yield. However, highly digestible forage-based diets may negatively affect feeding behavior and ruminal fermentation. Fourteen multiparous Holstein cows (six ruminally fistulated) averaging 196 days in milk were used in a crossover design study with two-week periods (10-days adaptation, four-days collection) to determine the effect of NDF digestibility of corn silage on chewing behavior, ruminal fermentation, total tract digestibility and lactational performance. Dietary treatments consisted of 1:1 replacement (dry matter, or DM, basis) of conventional corn silage with brown midrib corn silage (BMR). The total mixed ration (TMR) contained 43 percent corn silage, 15 percent grass silage and 42 percent corn-soybean based grain mix (DM basis). The NDF content was 37.7 and 42.0 percent, the physically effective NDF (peNDF) was 35.8 and 39.6 percent, and 24-h NDF digestibility was 42.3 and 57.0 percent NDF for the conventional and BMR corn silages, respectively. Data were analyzed as a crossover design using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Cows had higher dry matter intake but lower feed efficiency when fed the BMR diet. Diet did not affect milk yield, milk composition, time spent eating or time spent ruminating. However, cows chewed less per unit of NDF and had a lower mean pH over a 24 hour period when fed the BMR diet. Highly digestible forage does not stimulate chewing to the extent that would be predicted based on standard laboratory methods, such as peNDF. Measurement of peNDF may need to be adjusted based on forage NDF digestibility since chewing response is a function of forage particle size and NDF digestibility.

222 Alternative Approaches of Replication for Estimating in Vitro Starch Disappearance

Measuring disappearance kinetics of starch and other substrates as they ferment is expensive and labor intensive because replicated serial measurements are needed. Assuming starch is 100 percent digested, rates of disappearance could be calculated theoretically from measurements at a single time by assuming that disappearance is zero at a fixed and assumed lag time. However this approach is dependent on removal of outliers and high precision in the measurement of in vitro starch digestion (IVSD). Our objective was to evaluate alternative strategies for minimizing the number of IVSD needed to measure starch disappearance rates. The IVSD of six samples of corn grain or silage (4-mm grind) were measured in quadruplicate on three consecutive days by Cumberland Valley Analytical Services, Inc. using a composite inoculum from three donors fed total mixed ration (TMR). Measurements were made at two, four, six, 12, 18 and 24 hours. Local regression (Proc LOESS in SAS) was used to detect outliers. LOESS has the advantage that not only the observations replicated within day, but also those from repeated days and serial times can be used to detect outliers. Proc NLIN of SAS was used to fit a model with a single exponential pool with discrete lag to the results. Rate and lag estimates were generated for each replicate within day. Proc MIXED of SAS was used to test day effects with random replicates. There was no difference among consecutive days for rates (P = 0.13) but a 1-hour difference in lags (P = 0.04). All 72 measurements for each feed were used to estimate the overall rate of starch disappearance, which varied from 0.114 to 0.168/h for the six corn sources. Deviations from the overall rate for each source were calculated by using four replicates within each day or two replicates from each of two days. There was no difference in deviations, absolute deviations or squared deviation for within-day or among-day rate estimates. When two replicates within day were compared with one replicate from two days there was no difference in replication approach. For consecutive-day in vitro, it appears that replications within day are as accurate as between day replicates for estimating rate.

Starch in Dairy Cattle Diets During Times of High Corn Prices

August 10th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

Luiz Ferraretto, Matt Akins, Shane Fredin and Randy Shaver

Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin Logo

Increased corn prices have created great interest in the potential for feeding reduced-starch diets. One option for formulating reduced-starch diets is to partially replace corn grain with high-fiber, low-starch byproduct feedstuffs. Another option is the partial replacement of corn grain with corn silage to reduce purchased feed costs, also resulting in reduced-starch diets.

Effects on Milk Production

Lactation performance responses to reduced-starch diets from four recent continuous-lactation experiments are reviewed in this article. Three trials were from University of Wisconsin-Madison (UW; Gencoglu et al., 2010; Ferraretto et al., 2011a,b) and evaluated high-fiber, low-starch byproduct feeds as partial corn grain replacers, while a trial from the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC; Weiss et al., 2011) evaluated the partial replacement of corn grain with corn silage. The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) from forage concentrations were 20 to 21 percent across all diets with 5 to 10 percent units less starch for reduced-starch (RS) than normal-starch (NS) diets in the UW trials. For the OARDC trial, NDF from forage concentrations were 23 and 26 percent for the NS and RS diets, respectively, with 5 percent units less starch for RS than NS diets. Across the four trials, the earliest and latest days in milk (DIM) at trial initiation were 51 and 114 days, respectively, and treatment length ranged from 10 to 14 weeks. Milk yield for cows fed the NS diet ranged from 38 kg to 52 kg/cow/d across the four trials.

Changes in Dry Matter Intake

Dry matter intake (DMI) was greater for RS than NS in the UW trials, but lower for RS than NS in the OARDC trial. Greater DMI for RS than NS in the UW trials may be related to reduced ruminal propionate concentration (Allen, 1997; Beckman and Weiss, 2005) leading to increased meal size and consequently greater DMI (Allen et al., 2009). Firkins (1997) suggested that increased digestibility and passage rate of byproduct NDF can allow for increased NDF intake relative to forage NDF, which could explain the difference in DMI response for RS between the UW trials and the OARDC trial. In other words, rumen fill likely limited DMI in the OARDC trial (23 to 26 percent NDF from forage), but not in the UW trials (20 to 21 percent NDF from forage), where metabolic control of DMI appears to have been more likely (Allen et al., 2009).

Milk Yield Responses

Actual milk yield was similar for cows fed RS and NS in the UW trials with soy hulls (SH) (Gencoglu et al., 2010; Ferraretto et al., 2011b), but tended (P < 0.07) to be 4 percent lower for RS than NS in the UW trial with whole cottonseed (WCS) and wheat middlings (WM; Ferraretto et al., 2011a). Because WCS and WM are moderate-protein ingredients, they partially replaced both corn grain and soybean meal (SBM) in the RS diet. Greater ruminal protein degradation for these ingredients compared to SBM along with reduced rumen microbial protein production for RS may have decreased metabolizable protein flow, which could partially explain the decrease in milk yield (NRC, 2001). Actual milk yield was lower (P < 0.05) for RS than NS in the OARDC trial and was consistent with the DMI response in that trial. Responses for milk yield corrected for concentrations of fat, protein and lactose (solids-corrected milk, or SCM) were inconsistent for the UW trials with either greater (P < 0.03; Gencoglu et al., 2010), trend for lower (P < 0.08; Ferraretto et al., 2011b), or similar (P > 0.10; Ferraretto et al., 2011a) SCM observed for RS compared to NS. The SCM yield was lower (P < 0.05) for RS than NS in the OARDC trial and was consistent with the actual milk yield and DMI responses in that trial. Body weight gain was not different for cows fed RS compared to cows fed NS across the four trials.

Feed Efficiency Results

Feed efficiencies, across the four trials, were reduced for RS compared to NS by 5 to 12 percent for milk/DMI and by 4 to 11 percent for SCM/DMI. Reduced feed efficiency (FE) for dairy cows fed RS diets creates an economic concern for nutritionists desiring to use this formulation strategy to reduce diet cost per unit of dry matter (DM). Midwest USA Spring-2011 market prices for feed ingredients and milk were applied to ration composition, DMI and milk production data from the four trials to estimate feed costs and income over feed cost (IOFC). Feed costs per unit DM were reduced in all trials by 3 to 8 percent for RS. Feed costs per cow per day for RS, however, were increased for two trials by 3 to 5 percent and decreased for two trials by 5 to 10 percent. Estimates of IOFC were unaffected in one trial, increased in one trial by 4 percent for RS, and decreased in two trials by 6 to 7 percent for RS.

FE and IOFC results indicate that for high-producing cows in early to mid-lactation, partially replacing corn grain with NDF from either high-fiber byproducts or corn silage to formulate RS diets was not beneficial. Reduced market prices for high-fiber byproducts relative to corn grain and soybean meal would improve the economics of feeding RS compared to NS diets. Use of higher-quality corn silage with reduced NDF content and (or) greater NDF digestibility when partially replacing corn grain with corn silage in RS diets may improve responses compared to the trials reviewed herein, and further research is warranted. Furthermore, RS diets formulated by partially replacing starch with fiber may offer more potential for beneficial responses when fed to lower producing, later lactation cows than evaluated in the trials reviewed herein; potentially less concerns about rumen fill limitations to DMI and milk yield when partially replacing starch with forage NDF or reduced FE when partially replacing starch with byproduct NDF (Allen, 2008).

For a downloadable PDF of this article, click here.

REFERENCES

Allen, M. S. 2008. Grouping lactating cows. Pacific NW Anim. Nutr. Conf. Proceedings, Tacoma, WA, pp.1-6.

Allen, M. S. 1997. Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1447-1462.

Allen, M. S., Bradford, B. J., and Oba, M. 2009. The hepatic oxidation theory of the control of feed intake and its application to ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 87:3317-3334.

Beckman, J. L., and Weiss, W. P. 2005. Nutrient digestibility of diets with different fiber to starch ratios when fed to lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 88:1015-1023.

Ferraretto, L. F., Shaver, R. D., and Bertics, S. J. 2011a. Effect of live-cell yeast at two dosages on lactation performance by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. (Suppl.1): (Abstr.). In press.

Ferraretto, L. F., Shaver, R. D., Espineira, M., Gencoglu, H., and Bertics, S. J. 2011b. Influence of a reduced-starch diet with or without exogenous amylase on lactation performance by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 94:1490-1499.

Firkins, J. L. 1997. Effects of feeding nonforage fiber sources on site of fiber digestion. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1426-1437.

Gencoglu, H., Shaver, R. D., Steinberg, W., Ensink, J., Ferraretto, L. F.,
Bertics, S. J., Lopes, J. C., and Akins, M. S. 2010. Effect of feeding a reduced-starch diet with or without amylase addition on lactation performance in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 93: 723-732. NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.

Weiss, W. P., Steinberg, W., and Engstrom, M. A. 2011. Milk production and nutrient digestibility by dairy cows when fed exogenous amylase with coarsely ground dry corn. J. Dairy Sci. 94:2492-2499.

Corn Yields Affected by High Temperatures and Lack of Rain

July 29th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

As a result of the current record-breaking heat throughout the U.S., farmers who were forced to plant corn later in the season due to heavy spring rains may be noticing signs of heat stress and reduced yield potential.

Peter Thomison, corn scientist at The Ohio State University Extension, says that because of the wet spring, corn was either planted early or late this year. In Ohio alone, it’s estimated that 30 to 40 percent of the corn crop was planted in mid-May, while the bulk was planted after Memorial Day.

“Given the variability of corn in the fields, some of the later corn isn’t rooting very well because of soil conditions at planting – things like sidewall compaction and varying planting depths,” said Thomison. “Because of the intense heat and lack of rainfall this summer, some of that corn isn’t performing well, even though it was planted in a moist soil bed. Some of this corn could be six feet tall, and in the same field there’s corn waist high.”

The high temperatures and reduced moisture in the soil can also wreck havoc during tasseling, as corn’s water use is highest during this stage. Thomison suggests that the combination of high temperatures and the lack of water could result in sizable kernel abortion after pollination. While the ovules may still get pollinated, the lack of moisture will cause the kernels to abort – prompting tip dieback.

Across the U.S. the forecast for August shows average or below average rainfall and more high temperatures, ensuring this issue will remain paramount.

Read Thomison’s full comments on the subject in this AgWeb article.