nutridense banner image
nutridense banner image

When to Start Feeding Corn Silage

September 24th, 2009 by Jerry Weigel

One of the major goals of fermenting corn silage is reducing oxygen and increasing acidity as rapidly and efficiently as possible. This is required so that lactic-acid-based bacteria will proliferate to stabilize and preserve corn silage. The question is, how long should one wait before feeding corn silage? It is often believed that corn silage will be fairly well fermented and ready to be fed just three weeks post ensiling or chopping, but this isn’t the case.

It is important to understand how the final two phases of corn silage fermentation affect corn silage feeding quality. We understand in phase III, or the anaerobic fermentation phase, we should have depleted all the oxygen. The corn silage area should begin anaerobic fermentation about 15-16 days post chopping. As mentioned before, in this phase we want to ensure that the available sugars are converted to lactic acid, as well as some acetic acid, ethanol and a few minor products. In most cases corn silage should complete the active anaerobic fermentation in about a week, but that is just a rule of thumb. The rate and extent of fermentation depends to a large degree on the quantity of lactic acid bacteria. Here, harvest moisture will become a factor, as wetter forages ferment faster than drier ones.

The next stage, the storage phase, lasts a week to 10 days as the silage pH stabilizes. It has previously been thought that microbial and enzymatic activity occur minimally. That is now being revisited even in the presence of optimum pH and may be more important than simply dry matter loss and excessive heating within the storage area.

An interesting paper* by Ralph Ward, Cumberland Valley Analytical Services, and Mary Beth de Ondarza, Paradox Nutrition, contends that well-preserved corn silage contains more than 3.00% lactic acid and less than 3.00% acetic acid with a pH of <4. In the study, corn silage did not reach these component levels until 4 months post chopping.

We also need to understand and realize that the starch in corn silage increases in digestibility over time in storage due to:

• Glycolic enzyme production due to continued plant respiration
• Microbial enzyme activity
• Effect of solubilzation of prolamins by the production of bacterial based ethanol
• Acid hydrolysis of certain protein

Another paper** by C. M. Hallard and others reported that digestibility traits generally stabilized between 4 and 6 months but certainly leveled off at 6 months post chopping.

The important questions here are: how much starch is the rumen actually able to utilize, and how should we as nutritionists get the most efficient use of the starch level within the grain fraction? This is one of the reasons many nutritionists are focusing more on Neutral Detergent Fiber utilization than the total starch content of the corn silage. Ration formulation will allow us to alter corn inclusion into the feed while maintaining high Net Energy for Lactation values with greater digestible NDF. This also allows for a safer feed and could very well add to cow comfort as it creates a less challenged rumen.

I am not sure if we would see any increase in protein solubility in corn silage over time, but we do see increases in protein solubility over time with High Moisture Corn (HMC), so be careful when reading the literature on products being evaluated for protein solubility.

The above thoughts are the very reason we need to spend time planning and considering the time-span between chopping/ensiling corn silage and when feed-out starts. This is especially true for the formulating or consulting nutritionist to know. I have been involved with herds that could not maximize milk production due to underestimating nutrient uptake as well as metabolic and feed intake problems when we did not alter our rations due to improved solubilization.

One take home message here is that while it is okay to sample your silage at harvest or ensiling time for protein and moisture, do not use this analysis for ration formulation. Re-analyze your corn silage at feeding time and look for nutrient digestion over time, especially starch digestibility. There are a number of laboratories that can help you with this process.

So the bottom line becomes, how long does corn silage need to be kept in storage prior to feeding? The literature seems to suggest a minimum of 4 months (~120 days); certainly a minimum of 100 days is very realistic for maximum feeding value.

Jerry Weigel is the manager of nutrition and tech service for BASF Plant Science. You can contact him at gerald.weigel@basf.com.

* Ward, R. & de Ondarza, M.B. (2007). Is Corn Silage Stable After 3 Weeks of Fermentation? Cumberland Valley Analytical Services. Reprinted in the August, 25, 2009 issue of Feedstuff’s p 532.

** Hallard, C.M., Sapienza, A., Taysom, D. Effect of length of time ensiled on dry matter, starch and digestibility in whole plant corn silage. Journal of Animal Science, Vol 86, E-Supplement.

Harvest Management Tips

September 24th, 2009 by Jerry Weigel

As a dairy producer, you know that corn silage is a very important source of energy and fiber for dairy cows. Historically it has represented 40% to 45% of the ration Dry Matter, but today levels of 60% are being used. To ensure you are feeding your cows the best silage possible and protect the investment you have worked hard to grow, it is important to incorporate good silage management practices at harvest. Here are some tips to keep in mind at harvest, when storing and when feeding.

At harvest:
• Harvest corn silage at 35.00 percent Dry Matter (DM) and have a milk line of 1/2 to 2/3.
• To make sure corn is ready to be harvested, collect 15 plants/acre to check the milk line.
• Generally, silage should be chopped at 6-8 inches above the ground. If nitrates are suspected, chop at least 10 inches from the ground.
• Be sure all guards and shields are in place on your harvesting equipment.
• Make sure all harvesting equipment has been inspected, recently serviced, and sharpened.

When storing:
• Start by making sure your storage area is free of any moldy or bad quality silage.
• Fill your storage container as quickly as possible to discourage fungal growth.
• If you’re using a pit or bunker, make sure that there is a minimum of five minutes/wet ton for adequate packing.
• After packing, make sure that you have adequately sealed or covered your silage. Proper sealing will have an 8:1 return on monies spent.
• If pits or bunkers are used, it is recommended that 20 tires per 100 square feet are placed on the pile.

When feeding:
• At feed out, remove four to six inches per day across the entire face to reduce silage loss due to aerobic deterioration.
• If you are using a front-end loader, don’t scoop from the face of the pile. Instead, take the bucket and pull the silage off the face and then use the bucket to remove the fallen silage and all loose silage from the floor of the pile.
• Check for silage gas.
• Give the silage 100-120 days post harvest to ferment before feeding.
• Be sure to have your silage checked for dry matter and nutrient content.
• Silage additives can be used, but be careful to only utilize ones that have scientific evidence to support their use. As always, follow all label instructions.

Best wishes for a successful harvest!

Jerry Weigel is the manager of nutrition and tech service for BASF Plant Science. You can contact him at gerald.weigel@basf.com.

Silage Evaluation Part 2

September 21st, 2009 by Jerry Weigel

As a follow up to last week’s post, here is another question about MILK2006.

Question:
In MILK2006, with all variables held constant, what has the largest impact on milk/ton values: DM percent, NDFD percent or starch percent?

Answer:
The impact of DM%, NDFD% and starch % on MILK2006 milk/ton values are not similar across DM and NDFD levels. It appears that the starch % is the driver in digestible neutral detergent fiber. If the corn silage is even slightly immature with a low DM % (<30%), higher fiber and lower starch will be observed, suggesting a lower energy corn silage. Unfortunately starch is the main driver in MILK2006 as it relates to milk/ton, but this production prediction is not often observed in cow performance.

Silage Evaluation Part 1

September 16th, 2009 by Jerry Weigel

As we have said before, BASF Plant Science takes a biological approach to evaluating silage quality rather than relying on NIR alone. One such NIR evaluation is MILK2006. Over the next few weeks, we will answer some common questions about MILK2006 to increase your understand and help you make the most informed decision about how to evaluate your silage.

Question:
Does MILK2006 take into account kernel texture (endosperm properties), particle size, harvest maturity and whole plant dry matter in assessing hybrid properties?

Answer:
Kernel processing score (KPS) is a potential input value in MILK2006 with scores greater than 70% being optimal. The relationship, however, between KPS values and in vivo starch digestibility measurements is not well defined. This can result in highly variable measurements between laboratories since most silage samples are finely ground prior to analysis (the grinding may mask differences between samples). MILK2006 accounts for harvest maturity via whole plant dry matter (DM). However, this does not account for differences occurring between hybrids with varying DM content in the grain versus forage fractions of the whole-plant silage.

Silage Feeding Tips

September 14th, 2009 by Jerry Weigel

As a dairy producer, you’ve worked hard to grow and harvest the best silage possible for your cows. Here on some things to keep in mind as you begin feeding your silage.

• At feed out, remove four to six inches per day across the entire face to reduce silage loss due to aerobic deterioration.
• If you are using a front-end loader, don’t scoop from the face of the pile. Instead, take the bucket and pull the silage off the face and then use the bucket to remove the fallen silage and all loose silage from the floor of the pile.
• Check for silage gas.
• Give the silage 100-120 days post harvest to ferment before feeding.
• Be sure to have your silage checked for dry matter and nutrient content.

Silage Storage Tips

September 9th, 2009 by Jerry Weigel

Properly stored corn silage harvest decreases the chances of spoilage and helps make sure your cows are eating the best quality silage. Here are some things to keep in mind to protect the quality of your silage.

• Start by making sure your storage area is free of any moldy or bad quality silage.
• Fill your storage container as quickly as possible to discourage fungal growth.
• If you’re using a pit or bunker, make sure that there is a minimum of five minutes/wet ton for adequate packing.
• After packing, make sure that you have adequately sealed or covered your silage. Proper sealing will have an 8:1 return on monies spent.
• If pits or bunkers are used, it is recommended that 20 tires per 100 square feet are placed on the pile.

Silage Harvest Tips

September 7th, 2009 by Jerry Weigel

We don’t have to tell you that corn silage is an important source of energy and fiber for dairy cows. That’s why it’s so important to make sure to preserve silage quality through proper harvest and storage. Here are some tips for a successful harvest to ensure you are getting the most out of your crop.

• Harvest corn silage at 35.00 percent Dry Matter (DM) and have a milk line of 1/2 to 2/3.
• To make sure corn is ready to be harvested, collect 15 plants/acre to check the milk line.
• Generally, silage should be chopped at 6-8 inches above the ground. If nitrates are suspected, chop at least 10 inches from the ground.
• Be sure all guards and shields are in place on your harvesting equipment.
• Make sure all harvesting equipment has been inspected, recently serviced, and sharpened.

Considerations When Evaluating Silage Quality

August 11th, 2009 by Jerry Weigel

When it comes to silage quality, the dairy industry typically looks at yield and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIR) measurements, such as those found in MILK2006. However, neither of these indicators provides an accurate measurement of milk production and dairy farm profitability, two characteristics that should not be ignored.

One of the primary shortcomings of MILK2006 is that it only uses one sample to determine hybrid value and compares that against another single hybrid. Ideally, however, hybrids should be measured over a number of environments to determine mean nutritional value. For this reason, MILK2006 may not be an accurate method to summarize hybrid performance from a statistical standpoint.

Additionally, while MILK2006 does take into account Kernel Processing Score (KPS) as a potential input value, the relationship between KPS values and in situ starch digestibility measurements is not well defined. This can result in highly variable measurements between laboratories since most silage samples are finely ground prior to analysis (the grinding may mask differences between samples).

There are other potential problems that may prevent MILK2006 from accurately evaluating silage quality. MILK2006 accounts for harvest maturity via whole plant dry matter (DM). However, this does not account for differences occurring between hybrids with varying DM content in the grain versus forage fractions of the whole-plant silage. Furthermore, the primary management condition that MILK2006 accounts for is whole plant dry matter and whether the sample was harvested with a kernel processor. It does not directly account for post-harvest fermentation characteristics versus fresh cut forage.

One final concern that should be considered: although commercial laboratories sub-sample and conduct NIRS and wet chemistry analysis in replicate, the largest source of analytical error occurs during the sampling procedure and/or collection at the farm gate. MILK2006 cannot predict sampling error.

BASF Plant Science takes a biological approach to evaluating silage quality rather than relying on NIR alone. For example, two of the testing methods BASF Plant Science utilizes are the in situ technique and the in vitro measurement. The most accurate method for determining fiber utilization is the in situ technique, which measures disappearances in the rumen. This method tells us exactly how the rumen microbial population is evaluating the nutrients within NutriDense Silage as well as the rate of fiber utilization and fiber quality. The in vitro method determines the amount of Volatile Fatty Acid (VFA) production and in turn, enables us to determine real available energy.

Using these methods, NutriDense Silage outperforms conventional silage with:
• Up to 13% additional energy as a result of favorable fiber utilization
• An increase in feed efficiency as demonstrated by an 11.4% improvement in milk production efficiency
• A reduction in feed costs up to $.26 per cow per day

Please contact your NutriDense silage sales representative for additional information on these trials.

Jerry Weigel is the manager of nutrition and tech service for BASF Plant Science. You can contact him at gerald.weigel@basf.com.