nutridense banner image
nutridense banner image
basf logo

Sign up for ‘Have You Herd,’ technical dairy e-Newsletter

August 3rd, 2010 by Karlie Justus

Every other month, the NutriDense team puts together a technical e-Newsletter called “Have You Herd.” Tailored to the needs of dairy nutritionists, veterinarians and consultants, the e-Newsletter is a high-level resource on topics such as agronomy, feed efficiency and dairy nutrition. It also includes a roundup of industry news and upcoming events.

Here’s a sampling of some previous Have You Herd articles:

You can now sign up to receive Have You Herd in your e-mail inbox right here on the NutriDense website. Look for the Technical e-Newsletter button on the homepage and blog sidebars, or click on the image above. In addition, check out the full e-Newsletter archives here.

Consider a foliar fungicide for more tonnage and healthier plants

June 24th, 2010 by Courtney Beck

The use of foliar fungicides in corn grain production has gained favor over the past few years.  As grain prices increased, savvy producers realized that the investment in a well-timed fungicide application could pay huge yield dividends at harvest.  Corn silage, another valuable crop especially when chopped for high-performance dairies, can benefit from a foliar fungicide application as well.  The return on fungicide investment for the corn silage producer can be more tons per acre of higher-quality silage.

Corn growers have learned that the yield increases associated with some fungicides stem not only from a decrease in leaf diseases, but also from a general increase in plant health.  By reducing the incidence and severity of fungal leaf disease, the corn plant is better able to convert light energy into starch, protein and sugars.  Healthy plants are also better able to deal with the environmental stresses often encountered during the growing season. In silage, since the entire plant is harvested, the plant health aspect becomes even more valuable.

Foliar fungicides vary in their formulation and mode of action, and only a few products are labeled for applications to corn grown for silage.  Headline® fungicide, manufactured by BASF, is the fungicide most widely used by corn growers in North America.  Data from research plots and field trials have shown very positive responses to Headline applied to corn silage.  A trial in Plainfield, Wisconsin in 2008 showed an average of 1.62 tons/acre (at 70% moisture) increase from a Headline application over an average of 35 hybrids.  This yield increase translated to an average of 2,837 additional pounds of milk per acre using the standard dairy industry tons to milk calculation.  The results from a trial in Unity, Wisconsin were even more impressive.  Averaged over 21 different hybrids, the Headline application resulted in an extra 3.26 tons/acre and an increase of 3,986 pounds of milk per acre.

Silage quality can also be maintained by a timely application of Headline.  Trials grown in Wisconsin, Maryland and New York showed increases in fiber digestibility and corresponding increases in milk per acre when compared to an untreated check.

Another important benefit of a foliar fungicide application is the increase in “stay green” or late season plant health.  This increase in plant health means a wider silage harvest window.  Whether your customers are large operations with hundreds of acres of silage to cut or smaller operations waiting on a custom chopper, cutting silage at the proper moisture is an important step in harvesting quality corn silage.  Keeping the crop healthy and green for a longer period of time can pay huge dividends in the feed bunk.

After starting with the right hybrid, your customers can help maintain the nutrition potential of that silage crop with a timely fungicide application.  A foliar fungicide such as Headline can be a management tool in your customers’ quality silage plan.

This article was written by Mark Schultz, a sales agronomist for BASF Plant Science. He can be reached at mark.schultz@basf.com.

In the dairy industry, “agvocacy” is especially important

June 24th, 2010 by Greg Jones

Beyond the usual sounds of mooing and milking machines, the dairy industry has been making a lot of noise lately when it comes to positively sharing its story with consumers and media.

Now more than ever, it is important for everyone who touches the industry, from farmers and agribusiness professionals to nutritionists and veterinarians, to pitch in by writing op-eds for local newspapers, describing their work to friends and family, organizing meetings and more. These “agvocates” (agriculture advocates) help consumers better make the “farm to fork” connection and promote the importance of dairy to the economy, healthy diets and our farming culture.

One popular communications tool is social media, which encompasses online communications ranging from blogs to Twitter. When it comes to using social media to promote agriculture, the dairy industry is especially active. In fact, many online leaders credit dairy producers who utilize Twitter, Facebook and personal blogs as leading the way for the online agriculture community.

Online agvocacy efforts are ramped up even more than usual in June to celebrate National Dairy Month, as dairy enthusiasts share industry statistics, weather conditions in the field, information for consumers and positive stories from the farm. Even cows have joined in on the fun, tweeting live updates from their milking machines with a little help from radio frequency ID tags.

(more…)

Manage fertility to produce high-quality corn silage

April 15th, 2010 by Karlie Justus

High-quality corn silage in the bunker starts with a high-quality corn crop in the field.  The odds of successfully growing a high-quality corn crop are dependent on many factors.  Top producers manage the details they can control and thus, minimize the influence of the details they can’t, such as the environment, on their corn silage production.  One such detail that can be controlled is proper fertility.

Proper fertilization is essential for producing a high-quality corn silage crop.  Since a greater portion of the plant is harvested, the nutrient requirements for silage production are much different than corn grain production.  Under-fertilizing can put a corn silage crop under stress, produce stunted plants and result in lower tonnage and reduced quality.  The stress of poor fertility often leads to increased incidence of foliar and stalk rot diseases, which also have a negative effect on silage quality.  On the other hand, over-fertilizing also has consequences.  Over-application of nutrients, either commercial fertilizer or manure, can lead to off-site nutrient movement by runoff or leaching.  Another more apparent negative is that in the current dairy economy, producers can’t afford to spend money on inputs that don’t provide good return on investment.

A current, accurate soil test is the best place to start a corn silage fertility plan.  Like any journey, knowing where you are starting from is key to reaching your goals.  The three essential nutrients for corn silage growth are nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P) and potassium (K).  Nitrogen, the most important of these primary elements, is a mobile nutrient that needs to be supplied to the corn crop annually.  Nitrogen needs for silage are pretty similar to corn grown for grain, ranging from 150 to 200 pounds per acre.  Factors such as yield goals and previous crop are used for determining the optimum nitrogen rate for a grain crop and also hold true for silage.  When determining the rate for a corn silage crop, be sure to take all of these factors into consideration.  When applying manure, remember to start with an accurate analysis and use effective nitrogen rates.

(more…)

Managing corn silage in bunker silos

April 15th, 2010 by Jerry Weigel

Maximizing dairy production from a feeding standpoint is highly dependent upon producing and storing quality corn silage.  We spend quite a bit of time talking about proper operating procedures in harvesting corn silage — such as optimum harvest maturity and moisture, particle size, and packing management — but often times forget about feed-out and bunker management.

Today let’s chat about managing the face of the bunker, or what we refer to as feed-out rates.  It is well understood that the removal rate or feed-out rate is defined as inches of silage removed from the face (front) of the bunker. It is our feeling that a minimum of 6 inches per day should be removed during the summer and a minimum of 4 inches per day in the winter. A good recommendation when designing new bunkers is to design the bunker to take twice as much per day off the face, thus making a longer (versus wider) bunker that has a smaller face area.

It is also important to remember that as you open the bunker, you should only uncover the amount of silage you need at that time.  Excess plastic should be cut off each day, and at no time should two days worth of silage be exposed.

(more…)

Quality Control Ideas Relative to Total Mixed Ration (TMR) Considerations

February 3rd, 2010 by Jerry Weigel

The terms “quality,” “quality control” and “quality assurance” have all been defined in very narrow and certainly many different ways by the feed industry. The food industry has defined these terms to prevent defective and poor products and services as part of their manufacturing and delivering process. The feed industry also has this philosophy.

In my opinion whether you are talking about making a 16.00% Dairy Mix, producing ice cream or monitoring your total mixed ration (TMR), the words of Shewhart, as written in the Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product (1931) and published under the guidelines of the American Society for Quality Control, are important to remember:

Measured quality of manufactured product(s) is always subject to a certain amount of variation as a result of chance. Some stable “systems of chance causes” is inherent in any particular scheme of production and inspection. Variation within this stable pattern is inevitable. The reason(s) for variation outside this stable pattern must be discovered and corrected.

So, as we progress into a more targeted discussion about quality, let’s focus on the dairyman’s TMR. The nutritional advantages of using TMR-based feeding regimes have been written about since the late 1980’s. We know and understand about some of the advantages of TMR’s over separate feeding of forages and concentrates, and they include but certainly not limited to:

• More accurate proportions of forages and concentrates are delivered to the cows
• Ensuring a reduced risk of digestive upsets
• Assuring improved feed efficiency
• Improved response from certain industrial co-products (Hominy, DDGS, Gluten Feed)
• Better utilization of labor

I also realize that it is important to know the terminology around TMR, and those terms are:

Mixed Partial Ration (MPR) — MPR is often used in combination with TMR but top dressing of grain in the bunk or the use of computerized feeding systems also done. Often times free choice dry hay is used as well.
Mixed Total Ration (MTR) — A MTR is often used instead of the term TMR so they are the same.
Partially Mixed Ration (PMTR) — The PMTR is something that needs to be fixed, as the feed is not totally mixed and will be discussed in part within this discussion.
Totally Mixed Total Ration (TMTR) — The TMTR is the desired outcome of your mix.

In this discussion let us focus on the day-to-day aspect of TMR feeding.

It is my opinion that the success of any TMR and TMTR feeding regime absolutely requires the Herdsman, the person actually doing the feeding, and the Farm Manager or owner pay very close attention to the following areas

Changes in Dry Matter within the feed. Every dairy should have a moisture tester for their TMR. The TMR should be tested 2 times per week, minimum.

Add feeding ingredients in the proper order. Add the concentrates, like cereals and soya, first followed by the forages if you are using an auger mixer. Be sure and grind or chop dry forages and add them last, again with an auger system. If you are using a vertical mixer with center augers, add the dry chopped forages first followed by grains, concentrates and lastly the ensiled forages.

Do not over mix. Mixing time will vary with the type of mixer (auger or vertical), amount of feed in the mixer, size of the power (tractor or truck), and even the condition (old or new) of the mixer. It is recommended that the mixer should run 5 minutes from the time the last ingredient is added. In some vertical mixers the time may be shortened to 3 minutes. Over mixing creates a reduction in particle size and causes you to lose the physical effect of the fiber peNDF. This is why I recommend routinely checking particle size every 3 weeks, unless you see rumen/digestive upsets, with a particle size monitor, such as the Penn State Box. Follow their guidelines but remember that more than 10% on the top screen allows cows to sort feed ingredients.

Calibrate mixer scales. Check mixer weights at ⅓, ⅔ and full capacity. An easy and effective way to check this is to place a known amount of weight (such as 100 pounds) on each corner of the mixer at the 3 mentioned weight capacities and get your readings.

It is a must that you read in its entirety the manual for your mixer that you use for preparing your TMR.

To make sure your TMR mixer is functioning adequately and, more importantly consistently, sample several different locations within the bunk on a routine basis, say every month or so. Do this at the start of feed discharge, at 25%, 50%, 75% intervals across the feed bunk, and at the end of feed discharge. I have seen cases of digestive upsets in cows where they consume feed at the beginning of feed discharge, due to corn not being totally mixed and or not added at the correct time. Cattle are very dominate eaters and will often consume feed from the same place each day, each feeding.

Encouraging your customers to incorporating these suggestions into their Standard Operating Procedures will help them maximizing feed efficiency as well as the economics of milk production and cow well-being.

Jerry Weigel is the manager of nutrition and technical services for BASF Plant Science. He can be reached at gerald.weigel@basf.com.

Feeding Tips from the 2009 Penn State Dairy Cattle Nutrition Workshop

February 3rd, 2010 by Courtney Beck

Feed costs and milk prices were top of mind for all dairy producers in 2009, causing many to wonder what changes they could make to increase profitability. I recently had the opportunity to attend the 2009 Penn State Dairy Cattle Nutrition Workshop where Dr. Bill Weiss from The Ohio State University spoke on the topic of “Feeding Cows in Today’s Economy.” A few of the key messages on feed cost control that Dr. Weiss outlined in this presentation were:

• Economic Value of Feeds
• Ration Formulation Specifications
• On-farm Feeding Management Opportunities

Economic challenges have forced producers and nutritionists to re-think the nutritional strategies employed on today’s dairy operations. Dr. Weiss discusses rumen-undegradable protein (RUP) targets for specific lactation groups and what safety factors should be employed in RUP balancing. For example, he says “for a group of cows post peak dry matter intake, the RUP safety factor could be reduced to about 1.15 x pen average milk yield.”

Dr. Weiss and The Ohio State University provide several useful tools for evaluating and analyzing dairy management practices. The Feed Management toolbox provides a wealth of information as well as several calculators. One tool to take note of is the SESAME feed evaluation tool from Dr. Normand St-Pierre. This tool provides an analysis of feed values based on current price levels. The SESAME tool is a good way of using nutritional information to help dairy management determine the good valued feeds from those that are over valued.

If you’d like to learn more, click here to read Dr. Weiss’s paper.

Greg Jones is the NutriDense Silage Product Manager for BASF Plant Science. You can contact him at gregory.jones@basf.com.

When to Start Feeding Corn Silage

September 24th, 2009 by Jerry Weigel

One of the major goals of fermenting corn silage is reducing oxygen and increasing acidity as rapidly and efficiently as possible. This is required so that lactic-acid-based bacteria will proliferate to stabilize and preserve corn silage. The question is, how long should one wait before feeding corn silage? It is often believed that corn silage will be fairly well fermented and ready to be fed just three weeks post ensiling or chopping, but this isn’t the case.

It is important to understand how the final two phases of corn silage fermentation affect corn silage feeding quality. We understand in phase III, or the anaerobic fermentation phase, we should have depleted all the oxygen. The corn silage area should begin anaerobic fermentation about 15-16 days post chopping. As mentioned before, in this phase we want to ensure that the available sugars are converted to lactic acid, as well as some acetic acid, ethanol and a few minor products. In most cases corn silage should complete the active anaerobic fermentation in about a week, but that is just a rule of thumb. The rate and extent of fermentation depends to a large degree on the quantity of lactic acid bacteria. Here, harvest moisture will become a factor, as wetter forages ferment faster than drier ones.

The next stage, the storage phase, lasts a week to 10 days as the silage pH stabilizes. It has previously been thought that microbial and enzymatic activity occur minimally. That is now being revisited even in the presence of optimum pH and may be more important than simply dry matter loss and excessive heating within the storage area.

An interesting paper* by Ralph Ward, Cumberland Valley Analytical Services, and Mary Beth de Ondarza, Paradox Nutrition, contends that well-preserved corn silage contains more than 3.00% lactic acid and less than 3.00% acetic acid with a pH of <4. In the study, corn silage did not reach these component levels until 4 months post chopping.

We also need to understand and realize that the starch in corn silage increases in digestibility over time in storage due to:

• Glycolic enzyme production due to continued plant respiration
• Microbial enzyme activity
• Effect of solubilzation of prolamins by the production of bacterial based ethanol
• Acid hydrolysis of certain protein

Another paper** by C. M. Hallard and others reported that digestibility traits generally stabilized between 4 and 6 months but certainly leveled off at 6 months post chopping.

The important questions here are: how much starch is the rumen actually able to utilize, and how should we as nutritionists get the most efficient use of the starch level within the grain fraction? This is one of the reasons many nutritionists are focusing more on Neutral Detergent Fiber utilization than the total starch content of the corn silage. Ration formulation will allow us to alter corn inclusion into the feed while maintaining high Net Energy for Lactation values with greater digestible NDF. This also allows for a safer feed and could very well add to cow comfort as it creates a less challenged rumen.

I am not sure if we would see any increase in protein solubility in corn silage over time, but we do see increases in protein solubility over time with High Moisture Corn (HMC), so be careful when reading the literature on products being evaluated for protein solubility.

The above thoughts are the very reason we need to spend time planning and considering the time-span between chopping/ensiling corn silage and when feed-out starts. This is especially true for the formulating or consulting nutritionist to know. I have been involved with herds that could not maximize milk production due to underestimating nutrient uptake as well as metabolic and feed intake problems when we did not alter our rations due to improved solubilization.

One take home message here is that while it is okay to sample your silage at harvest or ensiling time for protein and moisture, do not use this analysis for ration formulation. Re-analyze your corn silage at feeding time and look for nutrient digestion over time, especially starch digestibility. There are a number of laboratories that can help you with this process.

So the bottom line becomes, how long does corn silage need to be kept in storage prior to feeding? The literature seems to suggest a minimum of 4 months (~120 days); certainly a minimum of 100 days is very realistic for maximum feeding value.

Jerry Weigel is the manager of nutrition and tech service for BASF Plant Science. You can contact him at gerald.weigel@basf.com.

* Ward, R. & de Ondarza, M.B. (2007). Is Corn Silage Stable After 3 Weeks of Fermentation? Cumberland Valley Analytical Services. Reprinted in the August, 25, 2009 issue of Feedstuff’s p 532.

** Hallard, C.M., Sapienza, A., Taysom, D. Effect of length of time ensiled on dry matter, starch and digestibility in whole plant corn silage. Journal of Animal Science, Vol 86, E-Supplement.

Harvest Management Tips

September 24th, 2009 by Jerry Weigel

As a dairy producer, you know that corn silage is a very important source of energy and fiber for dairy cows. Historically it has represented 40% to 45% of the ration Dry Matter, but today levels of 60% are being used. To ensure you are feeding your cows the best silage possible and protect the investment you have worked hard to grow, it is important to incorporate good silage management practices at harvest. Here are some tips to keep in mind at harvest, when storing and when feeding.

At harvest:
• Harvest corn silage at 35.00 percent Dry Matter (DM) and have a milk line of 1/2 to 2/3.
• To make sure corn is ready to be harvested, collect 15 plants/acre to check the milk line.
• Generally, silage should be chopped at 6-8 inches above the ground. If nitrates are suspected, chop at least 10 inches from the ground.
• Be sure all guards and shields are in place on your harvesting equipment.
• Make sure all harvesting equipment has been inspected, recently serviced, and sharpened.

When storing:
• Start by making sure your storage area is free of any moldy or bad quality silage.
• Fill your storage container as quickly as possible to discourage fungal growth.
• If you’re using a pit or bunker, make sure that there is a minimum of five minutes/wet ton for adequate packing.
• After packing, make sure that you have adequately sealed or covered your silage. Proper sealing will have an 8:1 return on monies spent.
• If pits or bunkers are used, it is recommended that 20 tires per 100 square feet are placed on the pile.

When feeding:
• At feed out, remove four to six inches per day across the entire face to reduce silage loss due to aerobic deterioration.
• If you are using a front-end loader, don’t scoop from the face of the pile. Instead, take the bucket and pull the silage off the face and then use the bucket to remove the fallen silage and all loose silage from the floor of the pile.
• Check for silage gas.
• Give the silage 100-120 days post harvest to ferment before feeding.
• Be sure to have your silage checked for dry matter and nutrient content.
• Silage additives can be used, but be careful to only utilize ones that have scientific evidence to support their use. As always, follow all label instructions.

Best wishes for a successful harvest!

Jerry Weigel is the manager of nutrition and tech service for BASF Plant Science. You can contact him at gerald.weigel@basf.com.

Considerations When Evaluating Silage Quality

August 11th, 2009 by Jerry Weigel

When it comes to silage quality, the dairy industry typically looks at yield and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIR) measurements, such as those found in MILK2006. However, neither of these indicators provides an accurate measurement of milk production and dairy farm profitability, two characteristics that should not be ignored.

One of the primary shortcomings of MILK2006 is that it only uses one sample to determine hybrid value and compares that against another single hybrid. Ideally, however, hybrids should be measured over a number of environments to determine mean nutritional value. For this reason, MILK2006 may not be an accurate method to summarize hybrid performance from a statistical standpoint.

Additionally, while MILK2006 does take into account Kernel Processing Score (KPS) as a potential input value, the relationship between KPS values and in situ starch digestibility measurements is not well defined. This can result in highly variable measurements between laboratories since most silage samples are finely ground prior to analysis (the grinding may mask differences between samples).

There are other potential problems that may prevent MILK2006 from accurately evaluating silage quality. MILK2006 accounts for harvest maturity via whole plant dry matter (DM). However, this does not account for differences occurring between hybrids with varying DM content in the grain versus forage fractions of the whole-plant silage. Furthermore, the primary management condition that MILK2006 accounts for is whole plant dry matter and whether the sample was harvested with a kernel processor. It does not directly account for post-harvest fermentation characteristics versus fresh cut forage.

One final concern that should be considered: although commercial laboratories sub-sample and conduct NIRS and wet chemistry analysis in replicate, the largest source of analytical error occurs during the sampling procedure and/or collection at the farm gate. MILK2006 cannot predict sampling error.

BASF Plant Science takes a biological approach to evaluating silage quality rather than relying on NIR alone. For example, two of the testing methods BASF Plant Science utilizes are the in situ technique and the in vitro measurement. The most accurate method for determining fiber utilization is the in situ technique, which measures disappearances in the rumen. This method tells us exactly how the rumen microbial population is evaluating the nutrients within NutriDense Silage as well as the rate of fiber utilization and fiber quality. The in vitro method determines the amount of Volatile Fatty Acid (VFA) production and in turn, enables us to determine real available energy.

Using these methods, NutriDense Silage outperforms conventional silage with:
• Up to 13% additional energy as a result of favorable fiber utilization
• An increase in feed efficiency as demonstrated by an 11.4% improvement in milk production efficiency
• A reduction in feed costs up to $.26 per cow per day

Please contact your NutriDense silage sales representative for additional information on these trials.

Jerry Weigel is the manager of nutrition and tech service for BASF Plant Science. You can contact him at gerald.weigel@basf.com.