nutridense banner image
nutridense banner image

Some Helpful Tools for 2012

January 11th, 2012 by Courtney Beck

As you’re planning for 2012, here are a few handy calculators to help you keep track of expenses and streamline production costs.

Determine the cost of production per acre with AgWeb’s Corn Margin Calculator. With this tool, you can determine the expected per bushel corn yield to determine your breakeven selling price and what optimizations you can make to improve your bottom line.

Speaking of bottom line, little changes in feed efficiency can have a big impact. Try out the NutriDense Silage Calculator to learn how much a 6 percent improvement in feed efficiency can save in feed costs.

What tools do you use to track expenses and keep costs down?

Obstacles to Corn Silage Quality

December 6th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

Steven T. Woodford, Ph.D., Nutrition Professionals Inc.

There has been tremendous improvement in corn genetics over the last decade, especially for corn silage. And yet, corn silage continues to suffer in an area where haylage in general does not – how it is made has a significant impact on its digestible energy. Many producers follow the old rule of thumb that if corn looks too green it’s too wet. Even if they know the actual dry matter (DM) of the corn silage standing in the field, the color can be the tie breaker on whether to chop or wait.

There is still a debate among nutritionists about whether it pays to lose a few points of corn silage DM to gain a few percentage points of starch, especially with high corn prices. If corn silage is processed properly, that should not be a problem. But in the real world there is still too much corn silage that is processed too dry. For example, Dairyland Laboratories Inc. includes statistics on their website citing that the average corn silage sample DM was 37 percent in 2009 and 36 percent in 2010, with fairly large standard error, meaning a significant number of samples came in above 40 percent. Additionally, according to the MILK2006 calculator, lowering corn silage moisture 5 percentage points drops milk per ton 5 percent on processed corn silage and 12 percent on unprocessed corn silage. This leads to the understanding that dry corn silage really is leaving energy on the table.

The second area that significantly affects corn silage digestible energy is processing. In my experience, close to half the corn silages I see are not optimally processed. There are several reasons for this, including poor understanding about optimum processing practices and opening the roller to gain speed. Prior to corn silage harvest, I make a point to discuss correct processing procedures and best practices with my clients. I suggest they look at every field harvested so the processor can be adjusted due to changes in variety and DM, and to use a simple test such as putting corn silage in a bucket of water and looking for whole kernels and large cob pieces that separate out. But often in the rush of getting harvest done, these checks are not made.

Thirdly, it is imperative to look at how new corn silage is feeding. I often find that forage tests do not accurately reflect how new corn silage will feed. In recent years I have been running a fecal starch before and after a new crop of corn silage is fed. If we see an increase in fecal starch on new corn silage and I feel it is related to the degree of processing, that is a teachable moment with the client. But that also needs to be reinforced 11 months later when corn silage is made again to make sure we get it right next time.

In conclusion, producing high-quality corn silage is very important, and the entire dairy management team holds a high stake in getting this right. The seed corn representative wants his corn to perform well, the nutritionist wants the cows to milk well and the producer wants to maximize profit. The agronomist often has the most input on when to chop, so working together as a team is ideal. I try to make sure the agronomist sees the samples I take so they know if optimum corn silage DM targets were hit. With the dairy management team working together, corn silage can continue to improve in quality.

Steven Woodford, Ph.D. is a nutritionist with Nutrition Professionals Inc., an independent firm of nutritionists based in Sheboygan Falls, Wis. You can contact him at swood@bytehead.com.

For a downloadable PDF of this article, click here.

Dairy Diet Tips

November 16th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

With corn prices still sky high, every producer wants increased feed efficiency and an income over feed cost advantage.

Starting in 2004, Randy Shaver, professor of dairy sciences at the University of Wisconsin, surveyed several top Wisconsin dairies every three years to evaluate their ration compositions and note any shifts in feed use.

He recently detailed his findings to Hay and Forage Grower, denoting the following changes from 2004 to 2010:

  • Movement toward forages, with an emphasis on corn silage.
  • Corn silage use in the Midwest has remained high.
  • Grasses are gaining attention in the Midwest.
  • Research with distillers grains is showing mixed results.
  • Whole cottonseed, while expensive, is still common in larger herds.
  • Straw use has rapidly declined for feed, as producers need the high-dollar product for bedding instead.

Read Shaver’s full interview and learn more about his findings here.

Silage Cycle: Harvest

September 13th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

When preparing to harvest a new crop of corn silage, it is important to remember that silage crops are never the same from year to year.

In general, silage harvest begins when the milk line is one-half to two-thirds of the way down the kernel, or 42 to 47 days after silking. However, evaluating fields individually is important because maturity and moisture stages in corn silage can vary due to factors such as weather conditions, weed management, soil moisture and soil fertility.

Proper maturity and whole-plant moisture levels at harvest helps ensure the overall quality of the silage at feed out. According to J.W. Schroeder, North Dakota State University Extension dairy specialist, harvesting corn silage when whole-plant moistures are around the 60 to 75 percent range will bring higher milk yields per ton of silage fed, as well as allow for proper storage conditions and fermentation processes.

To read more about harvesting silage corn at the right moisture, check out this Hay & Forage Grower article.

For further reading:

Research Roundup

August 10th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

Here are some of the latest research findings pertaining to silage and dairy production presented at the 2011 American Dairy Science Association/American Society of Animal Science Joint Annual Meeting in New Orleans, La.:

2011 ADSA®-ASAS Joint Annual Meeting - New Orleans, Louisiana

165 The Effects of Protease Enzymes and Storage on the Ensiling and Nutritive Value of Corn Silage

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding protease enzymes to chopped whole plant corn on silage fermentation and nutritive value after varying lengths of storage. Chopped and processed whole plant corn (Mycogen TMR2W726, Dow AgroScience, Indianapolis, Ind.) was harvested (36.3 percent dry matter) and ensiled without enzymes or treated with one of two different proteases (E85 or E86; AB Vista, Wiltshire, U.K.) at one times (1X) or one hundred times (100X) the manufacturer’s recommended dosage. The enzymes were mixed with a phosphate buffer and applied to chopped forage while mixing. Replicated-treated piles of forage were prepared for each enzyme treatment. Four bags of forage were vacuumed and heat-sealed for each enzyme treatment and storage time and allowed to ensile at 23 ± 2 degrees C for 45 and 150 days. The hypothesis was that in the silo, proteases would liberate starch and increase starch digestibility (Starch-D). The statistical analysis included the main effects of enzyme treatments, days of storage and their interactions. When compared with untreated silage, there was no effect of protease or length of storage (45 vs. 150 days) on pH, concentrations of crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) or starch. At 45 and 150 days, treatment with proteases did not affect NDF-D or the concentrations of lactic acid, acetic acid or ethanol when compared with untreated silage. Ammonia-N and soluble-N (percent of CP) contents increased after ensiling compared with levels at harvest and were greater (P < 0.01) for the 100X enzyme doses when compared with untreated silage at both storage times (45 and 150 days). Starch-D (ruminal in vitro, seven hours) was 66.3 percent for freshly chopped corn plants. After 45 days of ensiling, treatment with E86 100X had greater (P < 0.01) starch-D (80.6 percent) than all other treatments except it was similar to E85 100X. After 150 days of ensiling, E85 1X (81.9 percent), E85 100X (82.9 percent) and E86 100X (88.6 percent) had greater (P < 0.01) starch-D than untreated silage (74.0 percent). Effects of the proteases on amino acid content and for longer periods of storage will be determined. The data obtained to date suggests that exogenous proteases could be used to improve in vitro ruminal starch-D in corn silages.

M352 On-Farm Dry Matter Testing to Improve Feed Delivery Precision on Dairy Farms

Silage comprises a major portion of total mixed rations (TMR) in most dairy operations. The content of the TMR that is offered to the animals differs from the intended ration. The uncertainty of rations may affect feed efficiency and consequently milk production, feed expenses and environmental losses. When silage is measured by weight, unaccounted for changes in silage dry matter (DM) content may substantially change a fed ration. The objective of this study was to measure variation in silage DM on selected dairy farms and determine the potential usefulness of an electronic method of on-farm DM analysis. A field survey of 31 Maryland dairy producers obtained data about on-farm DM analysis frequency, DM analysis methods, ration analysis frequency, feeding regimen, milk production and number of cows. Of those surveyed, 83 percent reported testing forage DM more than once per year by any method, and 63 percent reported testing DM by an on-farm method; mean number of cows was 103, and mean reported rolling herd average was 22,100 pounds. Eight surveyed producers volunteered to collect on-farm DM data for 21 days. Producers performed daily DM analysis using a Farmex 1210 electronic silage tester, recorded observations on rain events, and recorded ration changes related to the daily DM analysis. Silage samples corresponding to the on-farm DM analyses were retained, and were analyzed for DM after drying at 55 degree C followed by 100 degrees C (as standard method) and electronic tester (in-lab). There were large differences among farms in how well different methods of DM analysis compared. The difference between on-farm DM (electronic) and standard DM had a mean of 1.82 percent and SD of 4.99 percent. Ninety-five percent of observations fell within the limits of agreement (1.96 x SD ± mean) of −7.97 and 11.60 percent. The electronic method did not compare well to laboratory DM analysis for most farms.

T337 Effect of Replacement of Conventional Corn Silage With Brown Midrib Corn Silage on Behavior and Performance of Lactating Dairy Cows

Feeding forages with high neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility to high-producing cows has the potential to increase feed intake and milk yield. However, highly digestible forage-based diets may negatively affect feeding behavior and ruminal fermentation. Fourteen multiparous Holstein cows (six ruminally fistulated) averaging 196 days in milk were used in a crossover design study with two-week periods (10-days adaptation, four-days collection) to determine the effect of NDF digestibility of corn silage on chewing behavior, ruminal fermentation, total tract digestibility and lactational performance. Dietary treatments consisted of 1:1 replacement (dry matter, or DM, basis) of conventional corn silage with brown midrib corn silage (BMR). The total mixed ration (TMR) contained 43 percent corn silage, 15 percent grass silage and 42 percent corn-soybean based grain mix (DM basis). The NDF content was 37.7 and 42.0 percent, the physically effective NDF (peNDF) was 35.8 and 39.6 percent, and 24-h NDF digestibility was 42.3 and 57.0 percent NDF for the conventional and BMR corn silages, respectively. Data were analyzed as a crossover design using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Cows had higher dry matter intake but lower feed efficiency when fed the BMR diet. Diet did not affect milk yield, milk composition, time spent eating or time spent ruminating. However, cows chewed less per unit of NDF and had a lower mean pH over a 24 hour period when fed the BMR diet. Highly digestible forage does not stimulate chewing to the extent that would be predicted based on standard laboratory methods, such as peNDF. Measurement of peNDF may need to be adjusted based on forage NDF digestibility since chewing response is a function of forage particle size and NDF digestibility.

222 Alternative Approaches of Replication for Estimating in Vitro Starch Disappearance

Measuring disappearance kinetics of starch and other substrates as they ferment is expensive and labor intensive because replicated serial measurements are needed. Assuming starch is 100 percent digested, rates of disappearance could be calculated theoretically from measurements at a single time by assuming that disappearance is zero at a fixed and assumed lag time. However this approach is dependent on removal of outliers and high precision in the measurement of in vitro starch digestion (IVSD). Our objective was to evaluate alternative strategies for minimizing the number of IVSD needed to measure starch disappearance rates. The IVSD of six samples of corn grain or silage (4-mm grind) were measured in quadruplicate on three consecutive days by Cumberland Valley Analytical Services, Inc. using a composite inoculum from three donors fed total mixed ration (TMR). Measurements were made at two, four, six, 12, 18 and 24 hours. Local regression (Proc LOESS in SAS) was used to detect outliers. LOESS has the advantage that not only the observations replicated within day, but also those from repeated days and serial times can be used to detect outliers. Proc NLIN of SAS was used to fit a model with a single exponential pool with discrete lag to the results. Rate and lag estimates were generated for each replicate within day. Proc MIXED of SAS was used to test day effects with random replicates. There was no difference among consecutive days for rates (P = 0.13) but a 1-hour difference in lags (P = 0.04). All 72 measurements for each feed were used to estimate the overall rate of starch disappearance, which varied from 0.114 to 0.168/h for the six corn sources. Deviations from the overall rate for each source were calculated by using four replicates within each day or two replicates from each of two days. There was no difference in deviations, absolute deviations or squared deviation for within-day or among-day rate estimates. When two replicates within day were compared with one replicate from two days there was no difference in replication approach. For consecutive-day in vitro, it appears that replications within day are as accurate as between day replicates for estimating rate.

Potential Economic Value of Increased Feed Efficiency in Dairy Cows via Corn Silage Quality

August 10th, 2011 by Rich Lutz

Rich Lutz, BASF Plant Science

Due to the constantly increasing cost of feed and milk production, improving feed efficiency (FE) is more important than ever in high-producing dairy herds. A number of papers on the subject have been published in recent years, including Casper (2008), Hutjens (2007, 2010), Erdman (2011) and Fry (2011).

Casper et al. (2003) observed that higher FE occurred when dairy herds were having high milk production on lower than expected dry matter intake (DMI). Evaluating these dairy herds indicated that the apparent reason for achieving higher milk production on lower than expected DMI appeared to be related to forage quality.

Hutjens (2010) offered practical applications on how improved forage quality impacts FE and profitability in dairy herds. With herd FE ranging from 1.4 to 1.7 (pounds of 3.5 percent milk per pound of dry matter, or DM) each 0.1 point change is worth approximately 34 cents per cow per day. Key factors impacting FE include forage quality, fiber digestibility, ration formulation, DMI and rumen health. Forage quality remains a key solution in obtaining optimum FE. Producers should consider increasing corn silage levels in rations as feed cost per cow per day may drop by 15 to 30 cents.

A recent Cornell University study (Chase, 2010) demonstrated significantly improved FE for high-producing dairy cows fed NutriDense Silage hybrids compared to those fed either dual purpose corn or brown midrib (BMR) corn silage hybrids.

Agronomic results from the Cornell University study demonstrated that the NutriDense Silage hybrid yielded 5 percent more tons of DM/acre than the BMR hybrid. Yields of the NutriDense Silage hybrid versus the Pioneer® dual purpose hybrid were not significantly different.

Agronomic Results

In the feeding trial, high-inclusion levels of corn silage were evaluated. Total mixed rations (TMR) consisted of 59 percent of the respective corn silage hybrid, 5.5 percent straw and 35.5 percent grain. Twenty cows were assigned to each treatment – NutriDense Silage, BMR or Pioneer dual purpose – at seven to 12 days post-calving and individually fed their respective rations for 10 weeks.

FE, 3.5 percent fat corrected milk (FCM) per pound of DMI, was significantly improved (P<0.002) for cows fed NutriDense Silage (1.87) compared to those fed either the dual purpose (1.74) or BMR (1.76) corn hybrids.

Feed Efficiency Values for Corn Silage Hybrids Varying in Fiber Digestibility

Although feeding the BMR-based TMR did result in improved milk production compared to those fed either dual purpose or NutriDense Silage, this increase in milk yield was a feed intake-driven response (higher DMI) and not indicative of greater energy contribution from the BMR corn silage.

Cows fed NutriDense Silage were 6.3 percent and 7.5 percent more efficient in converting DM into milk than those fed BMR or dual purpose hybrids, respectively. In addition, NutriDense Silage contained 6.3 percent more net energy for lactation (NEL) than BMR and 7.5 percent more NEL than the dual purpose hybrid. These data confirm earlier published work by Akay & Jackson (2001) and Spain & Sampson (2007), who reported improvements in FE when comparing NutriDense hybrids to dual purpose hybrids available in the marketplace.

Assuming 50 pounds DMI/cow/day and feed costs averaging $0.10 per pound of DM, the observed FE improvements could result in a significant income over feed cost (IOFC) advantage.

Potential Economic Value of Corn Silage Hybrids Varying in Fiber Digestibility

Utilizing the data generated from the 2010 Cornell University feeding trial, BASF Plant Science L.P. has developed a silage value calculator. This tool will allow the user to quickly evaluate the potential value that an improvement in FE may bring to a dairy operation, taking into consideration specific input values from the dairy.

Nutrition professionals and their producer clients may wish to consider evaluating corn silage hybrids that have demonstrated improved FE in controlled feeding trials.

For a downloadable PDF of this article, click here.

REFERENCES

Akay, V. and Jackson, J. K. Jr. 2001. Effects of NutriDense and waxy corn hybrids on the rumen fermentation, digestibility and lactation performance of dairy
cows
. J Dairy Sci; 84:1698-1706.

Casper, D. P., Whitlock, L. A., Schauff, D., and Jones, D. 2003. Consider the
intake/efficiency tradeoff. Hoard’s Dairyman 148:604.

Casper, D. P. 2008. Factors affecting feed efficiency of dairy cows. Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference, Fort Wayne IN. April 22-23, 2008, pp. 133-144.

Chase, L.E. 2010. Milk production and feed efficiency in dairy cows fed corn silage hybrids varying in fiber digestibility. 2010 ADSA PSA AMPA CSAS ASAS Joint Annual Meeting, Denver CO. Abstract #813.

Erdman, R. A. 2011. Monitoring feed efficiency in dairy cows using fat corrected milk per unit dry matter intake. 9th Mid-Atlantic Nutrition Conference, Timonium, MD. March 23-24, 2011.

Fry, R. C. 2011. Measuring feed efficiency why and how on the back of a napkin. 22nd Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium, Gainesville, FL. February 1 – 2, 2011.

Hutjens, M.F. 2007. Practical approaches to feed efficiency and applications on the farm. Penn State Dairy Cattle Nutrition Workshop Proceedings, pp. 1-5.

Hutjens, M.F. 2010. Lessons learned with low milk prices. 2010 NEAFA Dairy Health and Nutrition Conference Proceedings, Syracuse NY.

Spain, J.N. and Sampson, J.D. 2007. Use of NutriDense corn for corn and corn silage in diets fed to high producing dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. Vol. 85, Suppl. 1/J. Dairy Sci. Vol. 90 Suppl. 1, p. 556.

Back to Basics: Corn Silage

July 28th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

A lot of consideration and planning goes into all production farming practices. Corn silage, being a single harvest crop, requires considerably less labor and machinery time than other forages, making it a great choice to incorporate into well-managed forage practices.

Because of this, we are taking corn silage back to the basics and covering the fundamental guidelines that can help to increase yield and improve herd quality once it’s planted.

Weed Management

When crops have to compete with weeds for nutrients and water it will considerably affect your yield. Additionally, weed competition has been proven to greatly impact digestibility and protein content of silage. This competition can stunt the growth of your corn plants and possibly the size of the developing ear. Producers should be sure to scout their fields and apply timely herbicide applications when needed.

Harvest Decisions

A producer’s main concern when harvesting corn silage is to harvest the crop at the right time. Once the crop is determined to be at the correct moisture and maturity level, producers should harvest the crop quickly – trying to avoid excess run-off – and then store and process the corn silage in a manner that eliminates oxygen. The timeline of these steps will vary by region, but they are all equally important.

The quality of your corn silage will be affected by the maturity at harvest, as it influences grain content and moisture. As corn plants mature, they lose moisture. This lack of moisture causes starch to replace sugar, fiber and ash – resulting in reduced stover digestibility.

To learn more about corn silage, check out the links below:

Agronomic Tips: Foliar Fungicides

May 25th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

Corn silage is one crop that can really benefit from a well-timed fungicide application.

Consider the following:

  • Fungicide applications for corn silage could pay huge yield dividends at harvest, providing a producer with more tons per acre of higher-quality silage.
  • Fungicides can boost yields by decreasing leaf diseases and increasing plant health. In silage, since the entire plant is harvested, the plant health aspect becomes even more valuable.
  • Without struggling with fungal leaf disease, the corn plant is better able to convert light energy into starch, protein and sugars.
  • Foliar fungicide applications can increase “stay green” or late-season plant health, meaning a wider silage harvest window – keeping the crop healthy and green for a longer period of time can lead to greater profitability.
  • At a BASF trial in Unity, Wis., the Headline application resulted in an extra 3.26 tons/acre and 3,986 pounds of milk per acre.
  • Additional BASF trials in Wisconsin, Maryland and New York demonstrated increases in fiber digestibility and corresponding increases in milk per acre when compared to an untreated check.

For further reading:

Have You Been to Silage U?

April 19th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

Have you taken advantage of one of the latest NutriDense offerings, Silage University?

If you are a dairy producer, seed representative or just plan curious about what corn silage is all about, head on over to Silage U. There you’ll find a training module that walks you through animated diagrams, visuals and quotes from university researchers about silage.

You’ll learn about:

  • Why corn silage is important to dairy production
  • How the cow’s digestive system works
  • The definition of high-quality corn silage and why it’s so important
  • How corn silage quality is measured

Why Silage U? Listen to Greg Jones, NutriDense Silage product manager, explain more in this podcast.

Dairy producers adjust rations to beat high corn prices

March 30th, 2011 by Courtney Beck

Agri-View recently caught up with Lee Kilmer, an Iowa State University Extension dairy specialist, to discuss how dairy producers can reevaluate their rations to combat high corn prices. In the article, Kilmer provides insight on how nutritionists and researchers can examine starch digestibility to make better use of the starch in corn.

“One way to partly counter high corn prices is to feed less of it — or less starch,” Kilmer notes in the article. “Another way to combat high corn prices is to analyze the corn silage that’s being fed for its total starch content and the digestibility of the starch.”

For more tips on managing feed costs, check out these previous posts on The Corn Feed: